How Scotland’s eight relevant bodies can act as one to drive deep change

Homeless Network Scotland chief executive Maggie Brünjes discusses how the eight relevant bodies responsible for delivering the Ask and Act duties can use their collective influence – not only to prevent homelessness, but to drive the upstream change needed to tackle its root causes.

For as long as most of us can remember, the homelessness sector has operated as the emergency service. As the Hard Edges Scotland research starkly put it, too often left to “carry the can” for the missed opportunities to help people earlier.

We meet people when their housing, health and relationships have already broken down – when they are already carrying recent or life-long trauma and adversity. The sector provides a vital safety net, but it is ultimately too late. We are the ambulance after the event.

Ask and Act changes that. For the first time, it moves the entire system upstream. The eight relevant bodies named in the Act will now be required to ask about people’s housing situation in their everyday interactions – creating real, routine opportunities to prevent homelessness before it takes hold.

Aside from ensuring the new duties are adequately resourced, their success will rest on three underpinning factors: people, services and systems.

People first

The term ‘Ask and Act’ was coined by people with personal experience of homelessness. While professionals had wrestled with the complexity and enormity of defining the duties, a group of people who had navigated the homelessness system cut through it all: “Just ask.” Just ask people what they need.

That simple, powerful insight is at the heart of this reform. The ‘Ask’ is not a tick-box about housing status. It is about asking people what they actually need to stay housed. It puts the person, not the process, first.

The evidence is clear: preventing homelessness spares people deep trauma and upheaval – whether they are on their own or together in a family. It protects their mental wellbeing, financial stability, security, dignity and relationships. These new duties are not another ambulance after the event. They are the routine check-up that stops the crisis before it starts.

The homelessness sector has every reason to feel hopeful. This is exactly where we have always wanted the system to be: upstream, early and person-led.

Supporting services: where they can and cannot reach

Yet there is a stubborn myth that we can somehow fix services to fix people – that homelessness is simply an individual problem that competent professionals can solve with the right advice, support or rehabilitation, and that preventing it just requires us to act earlier.

This framing misses the deeper reality. Homelessness is driven by structural causes: poverty, the chronic undersupply of social homes, UK policy on welfare and immigration and inequalities baked into our housing system that hit certain groups hardest. These are not failures of people or of service delivery. They are the root conditions that keep producing homelessness.

Ask and Act takes prevention upstream, where services across the eight bodies can make a real and transformative difference – preventing individual homelessness earlier and reducing the risk of other problems developing or worsening. However, even the best services cannot stop the main flow into homelessness. Waiting for that will keep us trapped in a cycle where the flood of new cases never slows because the upstream drivers remain unchanged.

The eight relevant bodies have a powerful opportunity to use Ask and Act not just for individual prevention, but as a platform to tackle these systemic issues too.

Integrating systems: no wrong door

Scottish Government guidance on Ask and Act is in the pipeline and will be crucial. It will help each body embed the duties in its own practice. But homelessness prevention has never been – and never can be – the responsibility of a single agency.

People at the hard edges often face overlapping crises: poverty, trauma, addiction, mental health and offending. They are forced to retell their deepest pain to disconnected services that deal with one issue at a time. Siloed systems do not just fail them; they deepen the harm.

Ask and Act creates the chance to connect health, justice, housing, social care and social security so they work together around a person’s full needs, rather than one issue at a time. It also gives these bodies the platform to feed back what they are seeing on the ground and drive action on the upstream drivers.

Acting together, the eight relevant bodies have formidable leverage – and we urge them to use it. By acting as one they can ease the unsustainable pressure on their own services, deliver better outcomes for the people they support every day and tackle the root causes that keep driving demand.

What success looks like

Ask and Act is pivotal. Investment in it is crucial. But we will get a far greater return if the eight bodies combine their strengths and act together by:

  • Learning how to ask and act and creating the right environments for preventative services. 
  • Committing to joined up, cross-sector working that puts the person’s full needs first, rather than passing people from service to service.
  • Using their collective observations and influence to reduce new demand by tackling the upstream drivers – more homes, reduced poverty and inequality and more inclusive welfare and immigration policies.

When implementation is strong and joined-up working becomes real, Ask and Act will stop being a duty on paper and become the new normal: a system that keeps people housed.

The Ask and Act duties make explicit the responsibility of the wider public sector – at both national and local level – to ensure no one in Scotland is forced to live without a home. Now we need the resources to deliver, the ambition from every relevant body to match those intentions, and the courage to go much further upstream and change the conditions that keep creating homelessness in the first place.

February Network Briefing

The first Network Briefing of 2026 follows a busy start to the year, with the Scottish Budget and Spending Review, plus the announcement of a new national housing agency, More Homes Scotland.

Read the briefing for commentary and reaction to those events, plus all the latest research, news, updates and opportunities from within and beyond our sector. And this month we welcome a guest contribution to the Network Briefing from the Cabinet Secretary for Housing, Màiri McAllan.  

Read on for more and stay in the loop – subscribe here to receive your free briefing every month.  

Cabinet Secretary for Housing Màiri McAllan writes for the Network Briefing

“A budget is more than just a series of numbers on a page; it is an embodiment of our values”

– Barack Obama

Scotland already has a strong housing and homelessness policy framework, including some of the strongest homelessness rights in the world. By providing the financial backing needed to turn policy ambition into practical action, the 2026-27 Scottish Budget aligns investment with our vision for Scotland as a nation of prosperity, fairness and equality, where no one is left behind.

With a record £926 million committed to the Affordable Housing Supply Programme, this represents the largest single funding allocation for affordable housing since records began. This is part of our wider commitment of investing up to £4.9 billion over the next four years to support the delivery of 36,000 affordable homes, including family homes for up to 24,000 children – helping to tackle child poverty and end reliance on unsuitable temporary accommodation.

Everyone deserves somewhere to live that is safe, secure and meets their needs. The Scottish Government wants all temporary accommodation to be of good quality, and we have clear standards in place through the Unsuitable Accommodation Order and temporary accommodation standards framework, which local authorities are expected to meet.

However, I recognise the intense pressures councils are facing as they work to meet their statutory homelessness duties – pressures that have been exacerbated by a shortage of affordable housing, UK Home Office policy and Brexit, as well as global economic factors, including post-pandemic inflation and the energy crisis.

I have been clear that local authorities cannot be left to manage this challenge alone. Through my housing emergency action plan, £80 million has been targeted to the local authorities experiencing the most sustained temporary accommodation pressures, supporting the acquisition of homes and helping to reduce the use of unsuitable temporary accommodation such as bed and breakfasts and hotels.

This approach is already delivering results, with both City of Edinburgh and Fife councils giving positive indications they will achieve compliance with the law by March 2027. This must clearly be what we are all working towards.

Whilst these are undoubtedly steps in the right direction, hearing directly from people with lived experience of homelessness about the instability, trauma and barriers they face has convinced me that incremental change will not be enough. To successfully tackle the housing emergency, we must be prepared to take brave, bold action and change our approach.

That is why we intend to establish a new national housing agency providing simplicity, scale and speed in the delivery of the homes Scotland needs. This will help ensure that increased investment delivers the homes needed to prevent and end homelessness.

By accelerating the supply of affordable and social housing, unlocking stalled sites, and addressing barriers to delivery, it will create more settled housing options – helping to prevent the harm of homelessness, shorten time spent in temporary accommodation, and ease pressure on local authority homelessness services across Scotland.

Increasing the supply of homes, while essential, is only part of the solution. To successfully end homelessness, we must focus on prevention as well as provision, because preventing homelessness protects dignity, reduces inequality and unlocks opportunity.

In 2026-27 we are making a record £106 million available to local authorities to spend on Discretionary Housing Payments to help struggling households stay in their homes and prevent homelessness. This includes £83 million to ensure no one in Scotland pays the UK Government’s Bedroom Tax.

The ‘Ask and Act’ duties in the Housing (Scotland) Act 2025 place early intervention at the heart of our approach and will make preventing homelessness a shared responsibility across public services. To support this shift and to supplement funding for prevention activity included in the local government settlement, we provided £4 million this year to help non-housing services prepare for the new duties, alongside a further £4 million in 2026-27 for a range of homelessness prevention and response initiatives.

We will continue to report annually to Parliament on progress against the actions set out in our Ending Homelessness Together strategy, ensuring transparency and accountability, as we seek to deliver the systemic change needed to achieve real, measurable outcomes on the ground.

Ending homelessness is both a moral imperative and a measure of who we are as a nation, and I am determined to continue to drive the momentum needed to make that ambition a reality.

Budget Round-up: Advances in housing supply – but the gap to ending homelessness persists

The final Scottish Budget before the Holyrood election is a step in the right direction on housing and homelessness. But amid a continuing emergency that is causing real harm to people across Scotland, the next Scottish Government must go further to reverse chronic underfunding that is leaving thousands of people without a home.

The Budget confirms £4.1billion in public funding to deliver 36,000 affordable homes over the next four years, including 25,200 for social rent. This includes a welcome 21% increase on the original budget for 2026-27 – but falls short when independent research shows we need at least 15,693 affordable homes delivered every year to address homelessness.

A multi-year approach with funding rising year-on-year provides more certainty to attract investment and deliver on commitments. But this platform can do more than offer stability, important though that is – it can serve as a launchpad to significantly ramp up delivery towards that target.

Today, more than 17,240 households are trapped in temporary accommodation, including 10,180 children, who are waiting on average 238 days for a settled home. Without aiming higher, the human cost of this situation will rise alongside the eye-watering financial cost.

Prevention is key, alongside bricks and mortar. The Scottish Spending Review sets out a focus on preventative approaches across budgets and reform to join-up services. These commitments echo what the Everyone Home collective and All in for Change are calling for in their Housing Justice manifesto.

Targeted funding for Ask and Act

We urge the Scottish Government to prioritise implementation of a coherent and effective homelessness prevention system – including targeted resourcing now to lay the essential groundwork for the new Ask and Act homelessness prevention duties, so they work as intended when enacted in future years

The same goes for reforming public services. Those hit hardest by the housing emergency often face overlapping crises, yet services are built to tackle just one issue at a time.  Fixing that will prevent the worst harm to those worst off and save money for the public purse.

These are laudable policies that promise meaningful change. They must not be allowed to fall by the wayside with a change of administration – and the same goes for spending commitments on homelessness services and support, including Housing First.

On 7 May, we will cast our votes for the next Scottish Government. Whoever takes the reins needs to know that taking decisive action commensurate with the scale of the task to make sure everyone has a home may not be easy, but it is achievable and it is worth it – for people, communities and wider society.

As the Finance Secretary said when delivering her Budget:  “The choices we are able to take, in this, our national parliament, make a real difference for the people we serve.”

Our questions of the Finance Secretary and Cabinet Secretary for Housing are:

  1. What specific additional actions and updates will be allocated in the Tackling Child Poverty Delivery Plan and Housing to 2040 action plan to ensure the affordable housing commitment translates into enough social rented homes to prevent and end homelessness?
  2. How will the Ending Homelessness Together Fund be monitored to ensure it delivers systemic change, including targeted resourcing to lay the essential groundwork for the ‘Ask and Act’ duties with non-housing services?
  3. How will the Scottish Government work with local authorities and providers to reduce the use of unsuitable temporary accommodation, including setting clear expectations and timelines?

Homelessness and housing in the Budget at a glance:

  • £4.9billion investment in affordable homes over the next four years, including £4.1bn public sector funding, to support delivery of 36,000 affordable homes and wider all-tenure ambition. 

For 2026-27:

  • Continued funding of Discretionary Housing Payments to mitigate the UK bedroom tax, benefit cap and welfare shortfalls including the freeze in Local Housing Allowance rates.
  • £1.3million towards Scottish Empty Homes Partnership to expand the core service and fund new small‑scale projects.
  • £11.5million for the multi‑year ending homelessness together fund, for measures including Rapid Rehousing transition and the Fund to Leave, which supports women and children affected by domestic abuse.
  • £49million for Housing Support, Fuel Poverty and Housing Quality. 
  • Anti-poverty measures including a boost in weekly Scottish child payment to £40 for households with a baby under the age of one.

Find the full Budget and spending plans here: https://www.gov.scot/budget

Housing emergency risks return of communal night shelters, research finds

People facing homelessness in Scotland are once again at risk of trauma and harm as the housing emergency threatens the return of old-style communal night shelters, experts fear.

The warning, echoed by people with lived experience of using shelters, comes as groundbreaking research from Heriot-Watt University details how Scotland ended use of ‘shared air’ shelters from 2020-2024, following decades of work by the third sector and local and national government.

The University’s Institute for Social Policy, Housing, Equalities Research (I-SPHERE) sets out evidence of the serious impact communal shelters can have on people, including exposure to infectious disease and violence, and raises concerns the housing crisis could see more shelters open to fill gaps in emergency accommodation. But the research also shows a return to responses that prioritise good support and access to housing is achievable.

The peer-reviewed research, published in the International Journal on Homelessness, provides the first detailed analysis of how Scotland closed its emergency shelters during the pandemic and maintained a shelter-free response from 2020 to 2024.

Scotland’s approach included rapidly relocating residents to single-room accommodation and establishing Welcome Centres as multi-agency triage hubs. Within eight months, this emergency measure had evolved into formal Scottish Government policy to end dormitory-style shelter provision permanently. This was enabled by policy building blocks developed over previous decades, including strong legal rights to housing, a substantial social housing sector and robust welfare protections.

These foundations resulted in Scotland having comparatively low levels of rough sleeping, 40% lower than England, making shelter closure more achievable than in nations with higher rough sleeping rates.

The research also documents the extensive evidence of the harm caused by emergency shelters while demonstrating there is no evidence that shelters provide a pathway to permanent housing.

Shelters can result in:

  • Some people choosing to sleep rough and take other potentially life-threatening risks rather than use shelters
  • Worse health outcomes than receiving no support at all
  • Violence, infectious disease and drug-related harms from communal living
  • Rules and curfews that limit people’s freedom, high stress, stigmatisation and the feeling of being treated like a child
  • Damaged relationships with friends, family and children
  • People dealing with serious challenges trapped in cycles without their needs being met

Lived experience views

Suzanne, who has experienced homelessness and researched other people’s experiences of using services, said: “With the women it is all about safety. A lot of guys didn’t feel safe but what really came across was that women would rather sleep in the street or hook up with a guy to get away from having to go to the shelter.

“If the only alternative is an unregulated shelter, women would swerve towards going somewhere safe instead. A lot of people feel unsafe when they go into a shelter and can be triggered by the environment, causing them trauma and bringing up past trauma. Shelters are a sticking plaster. Until we come up with a solution there’s still a demand for them. We need an alternative.”

James, who also experienced homelessness, said: “My experience of night shelters was after presenting in Edinburgh. I was handed a list of churches where I could sleep on the floor. I had all my stuff with me, I was pointed to a yoga mat and given an itchy blanket.

“I lay uncomfortably cuddled into my backpack as I was worried it would be stolen when I was asleep. I pretty quickly realised many people were injecting legal highs. At some point during the night there was a queue for the toilet.

“People were sharing injecting equipment, and I later learned that at this point there was an HIV outbreak. This was not communicated and presented a serious risk to those arriving who were already struggling and vulnerable. Some of the community I met in that shelter were later sleeping in a mausoleum in a graveyard rather than using shelter accommodation.”

Threats to a shelter-free approach

Critically, the research identifies the serious threats to maintaining Scotland’s shelter-free approach, including:

  • Rising demand pressures: Homelessness applications increased by 10% in a single year (2021/22-2022/23), temporary accommodation use rose 29% in three years, and the Scottish Parliament declared a national housing emergency in May 2024.
  • During winter 2023/24, Glasgow’s Welcome Centre experienced surges in demand that strained resources.
  • Barriers for people with No Recourse to Public Funds: Current restrictions mean this group can only access emergency accommodation for limited periods, pushing vulnerable people towards rough sleeping or creating pressure for shelter provision.
  • Community pressure: In January 2024, a volunteer-run shelter opened in Glasgow despite concerns from people with lived experience about their safety as well as health risks and increased anti-social behaviour in the vicinity.

Professor Beth Watts-Cobbe, lead author from Heriot-Watt University’s Institute for Social Policy, Housing and Equalities Research, said: “Our research demonstrates that ending shelter use is achievable, as Scotland proved between 2020 and 2024. This was possible because of policy foundations built over decades combined with rapid action during the pandemic to relocate shelter residents to single-room accommodation.

“However, this progress is now under serious threat from rising demand, inadequate provision for people with No Recourse to Public Funds, and community pressure to reopen dormitory-style shelters. The evidence is clear that shelters perpetuate harms among exceptionally disadvantaged people and fail to provide pathways to sustainable housing. Returning to dormitory-style provision would represent a significant failure to minimise housing-related harms to those who are most in need of support.

“The key lesson from Scotland’s experience is that shelter-free responses are possible but require both the right policy foundations and sustained commitment to maintain them. Other jurisdictions can learn from Scotland’s approach but must recognise that creating these enabling conditions takes deliberate policy choices and adequate resourcing over time.”

The research acknowledges the important role of the Everyone Home Collective, convened by Homeless Network Scotland, in building cross-sector agreement around a shelter-free vision. Their Welcome Centre approach means providing rapid access to single-room accommodation.

We know the solutions

Maggie Brünjes, chief executive of Homeless Network Scotland, said: “For too long, the public image of homelessness has been stuck in an outdated stereotype of night shelters – basic, dormitory-style spaces congregating people in crisis, often accepted as inevitable and ‘good enough’ for those at the hardest edges of society.

“This critical new research highlights Scotland’s remarkable achievement in maintaining a shelter-free response from 2020 to 2024, decisively shifting to self-contained temporary accommodation and settled housing in the community. This hard-won progress – driven by leadership from Glasgow and Edinburgh local authorities, adaptive charities that modernised their services and strong Scottish Government policy – now risks reversal amid surging demand and the national housing emergency.

“People with first-hand experience, academics and charities have long made the case that communal shelters cause unnecessary harm and fear. The joint manifesto from the Everyone Home collective and All in For Change unites these interests ahead of the 2026 election, spelling out the solutions that need scaled for a Scotland where everyone has a home. This research shows that real progress is possible – but only through sustained investment and political commitment.”

The research also notes how both Bethany Christian Trust in Edinburgh and Glasgow City Mission, faith-based organisations that previously operated shelters, played important roles in relocating residents during the pandemic and have become providers of the alternative Welcome Centre model.

The researchers now urge policy makers to:

  • Maintain commitment to avoiding dormitory-style emergency provision, recognising that returns to this model represent failures to minimise housing-related harms
  • Address rising demand pressures through increased social housing supply, enhanced homelessness prevention, and adequate resourcing of alternative provision
  • Remove barriers preventing people with No Recourse to Public Funds from accessing emergency accommodation beyond single nights, recognising that current restrictions push vulnerable people towards rough sleeping
  • Invest in and expand alternatives to shelters including single-room accommodation to provide access to mainstream housing with support
  • Recognise that maintaining the policy foundations that have enabled a shelter-free Scotland to be maintained

The research emphasises that Scotland’s experience provides important lessons for homelessness policy globally, particularly in the Global North, demonstrating that reliance on harmful dormitory-style shelters is neither inevitable nor necessary. However, it acknowledges that Scotland’s achievement was enabled by comparatively low rough sleeping levels and specific policy foundations developed over decades.